Controversy involving Zynga? Who’d have expected that?
Actually, that’s a little unfair in this case. Their involvement is only to the point of refusing to negotiate over a job offer with programmer Shay Pierce after Zynga purchased OMGPOP. Pierce refused the new contract, after the sides couldn’t agree on terms regarding games he had independently released in the App Store, and left the team while every other OMGPOP employee sign the new deal.
Pierce wrote a short article about his decision, which you can find here. It’s not big news: he quit because he was worried Zynga would claim control of his indie projects, and attempted negotiations were met with a flat refusal.
But then came some interesting tweets from OMGPOP’s CEO. Dan Porter first posted “The one OMGPOP employee who turned down joining Zynga was the weakest one on the whole team. Selfish people make bad games. Good riddance!”.
Business Insider also ran a story about Pierce after receiving an email from “an OMGPOP source” which heavily criticized Pierce’s work ethic and claimed he was about to be fired.
“‘He frequently took long lunches, his coding was poor, and right before his team was about to release our new Facebook game, Streets, he took off for a week to promote his own game at the GDC conference,’ says the source. According to this OMGPOP source, this all happened while Pierce’s team was pulling late nights in the office to prepare for launch.”
Pierce naturally has a different take on things, saying he attended GDC for “professional development”, and noting he was not giving any indication his position at the company was under threat.
Dan Porter found himself roundly criticized for his tweets, with Minecraft developer Notch calling him “insane”. Porter issued a new statement on the topic:
““When I saw how all the people who actually worked on [Draw Something] felt after [Pierce's Gamasutra] article, it was very hurtful,” Porter wrote. “It’s grandstanding, and I’m sure I was overly emotional, because I wasn’t thinking about Shay. I was thinking about the people [on the team] who don’t get in the press.”
Porter admitted that the he was harsh in his language describing Pierce. “Yes it was, but my point is that it wasn’t about Shay. It was about the 41 other people who made it happen,” Porter wrote. “Those are the people I would throw myself in front of the train for and those are the people I want to celebrate.”” [Read more]
The internet has come out roundly in favor of Pierce here, although it’s hard to justify taking sides without a more objective view of the situation. Whether Pierce is actually a hardworking employee or not is something the two sides can’t seem to agree on, and while Porter’s comments were unprofessional, it has to be noted that Pierce was the first to take the dispute public.
What do you think? Is a CEO ever justified in criticizing former employees in public? Leave a comment below!
Did you like this? Share it: